Importance of anti-recording and anti-eavesdropping in enterprises

　　This situation can be seen in many film footages. An organization’s conference room or executive office is installed with wiretapping equipment in the home, and then monitors the organization’s meetings or individual conversations. In fact, this kind of situation does not only appear in movies. It is normal to install wiretap or voice recorder in commercial negotiations or private conversation places to steal trade secrets and personal privacy and cause major losses.

　　In modern commercial warfare, therefore, enterprises should pay more attention to anti-eavesdropping. And on some important occasions or important meetings, no one can guarantee that in an important meeting, their competitors will not install some monitoring equipment. In this case, business will also appear in your own company. The threat of a secret being leaked.

　　For some company secrets, they often cause great losses to themselves. Shopping malls are like battlefields. This sentence is very correct. If you want to maximize your chances of victory during the entire war, you may have to Use some unconventional means (installation of eavesdropping equipment, recording pens, etc.) to monitor the other party's movements or messages.

　　On July 5, 2009, four Rio Tinto employees, including Hu Shitai, Wang Yong, Ge Minqiang, and Liu Caikui, were criminally detained by the Shanghai Municipal State Security Bureau. On July 9, 2009, the Shanghai National Security Bureau stated that Hu Shitai and other four persons used improper means to spy and steal Chinese state secrets. On August 11, 2009, when Hu Shitai and the other four were formally arrested, their charges were downgraded to "suspicion of infringement of trade secrets and bribery of non-state personnel."

　　On February 10, 2010, the First Branch of the Shanghai Municipal People's Procuratorate filed a public prosecution with the Shanghai No. 1 Intermediate People's Court in a case involving four people including Hu Shitai from Rio Tinto, Australia, who were suspected of taking bribes and infringing on commercial secrets by non-state employees. On March 22, 2010, four Rio Tinto employees who were prosecuted for accepting bribes and infringing on trade secrets pleaded guilty to accepting bribes. Yesterday and the day before yesterday, the “Rio Tinto case” that received much attention was heard in the First Court of Shanghai No. 1 Intermediate People’s Court (hereinafter referred to as “Shanghai No. 1 Intermediate Court”).

　　On the afternoon of March 29, 2010, the Shanghai No. 1 Intermediate People's Court made a first-instance judgment in the Rio Tinto case, convicting Hu Shitai, Wang Yong, Ge Minqiang, and Liu Caikui as guilty of bribery and infringement of commercial secrets by non-state officials, and sentenced them to a fixed period of time. The imprisonment ranges from fourteen to seven years. The Rio Tinto incident opened the curtain on the confidentiality work of Chinese enterprises. The State Secrecy Bureau, the State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission, the Ministry of Commerce and the industry authorities (industry associations) have strengthened their administrative intervention in the economic confidentiality work of key enterprises within their respective statutory terms of reference. Enterprises urgently need a large number of full-time confidential staff to invest in the protection of trade secrets.

　　With the development of the information society, audio and video information is showing explosive growth and viral transmission. There is a risk that personal privacy, business secrets and other information will be leaked through conversations, especially how valuable conversation information can be protected. Content is not stolen by others?

　　The most effective way to prevent recording is to generate random noise signals through the recording muffler, which can suppress the voice signal, so that the recording equipment picks up only noise information, but cannot distinguish the voice information, and cannot be distinguished from the recorded signal. Restore the original information to ensure the security of the voice information. The recording blocker adopts security encryption processing, and effectively prevents post-recovery by mixing high and low frequency audio sources.

Read recommendations:

8000 detector

Waterproof Portable 360 Degree Anti UAV Drone Jammer

1.2G 100W anti drone module

Police blow up 3 Tanzanian vehicle jammers

Have you not received the installation process of the prison cell phone signal?

How to block the signal to prevent recording?